Performance Level (PL) vs. Safety Integrity Level (SIL)

PL (Performance Level) faces off against SIL (Safety Integrity Level)
This is a classic battle between ISO and IEC standards (ISO 13849 vs IEC 62061).

iso vs iec standards

I always like to simplify, so let’s start by naming a clear winner in this match. Wait – there isn’t one! PL and SIL are basically the same thing. (But don’t tell that to the folks on the standards committees … they won’t like me for saying that.)

As mentioned above, Performance Level is a probability rating that originates from ISO 13849. Safety Integrity Level is a probability rating that originates from IEC 62061.

The main difference between these two standards is this: ISO 13849 addresses mechanical devices used in safety applications (such as mechanical gate switches, safety limit switches, or valves); IEC 62061 does not.

But most machines have mechanical devices on them, right? IEC 62061 is meant for electronic and programmable safety systems; it addresses programming techniques and best practices (ISO 13849 does not). To better understand PL and SIL, let’s review what defines a safety circuit.


Understanding Safety Circuits

Remember, a safety circuit is the WHOLE circuit, which includes the input, logic, and output safety devices. The PL or SIL rating is a rating for all of those working together. The PL or SIL of these safety-related parts of a control system must at least equal the required PL or SIL. The required PL (PLr) is determined in a Risk Assessment.

PL ratings are designated as a through e (PLe being the highest rating). SIL ratings are designated as 1, 2, or 3 (SIL3 being the highest rating).

A safety circuit (safety function) has three required characteristics:

  1. Design structure (single channel or dual channel)
  2. Monitoring
  3. Time before the first dangerous safety circuit failure

Both standards agree on these three items – they just call them by different names, as illustrated below.

ISO 13849 nomenclature:

    1. Category (1-4) = design structure
    2. Diagnostic coverage (DC%) = monitoring
    3. MTTFd (Mean Time to Dangerous Failure) = time before first dangerous failure

IEC 62061 nomenclature:

    1. Hardware fault tolerance = design structure
    2. Safe failure fraction = monitoring
    3. PFHd (Probability of Failure on Demand per Hour) = time before first dangerous failure. PFHd is calculated from MTTFd [above].

Here’s a simple example: The more dangerous the hazard, the better the safety circuit must be.
You need a very robust safety circuit to protect you from a hazard if it’s so dangerous that it could kill you, it’s fast-moving and likely not avoidable, and you are exposed to it at all times.

On the other hand, you wouldn’t need nearly as robust a safety circuit if a machine’s hazard gives you (at best) a decent bruise if it strikes you, it’s slow-moving and easy to avoid, and you’re not exposed to it very often.

Calculating Probability of Dangerous Failure per Hour

Let’s compare these two charts, which reference the probability of dangerous failure per hour in ISO 13849 and IEC 62061:

ISO 13849
Performance Levels (PL)

PL Average probability of dangerous failure per hour
1/h
a ≥ 10-5 to < 10-4
b ≥ 3 × 10-6 to < 10-5
c ≥ 10-6 to < 3 × 10-6
d ≥ 10-7 to < 10-6
e ≥ 10-8 to < 10-7
NOTE: Besides the average profitability of dangerous failure per hour, other measures are also necessary to achieve the PL.

IEC 62061
Safety integrity levels: target failure values for SRCFs

Safety integrity level Probability of a dangerous Failure per hour (PFHD)
3 ≥ 10-8 to < 10-7
2 ≥ 10-7 to < 10-6
1 ≥ 10-6 to < 10-5

As you can see, both standards want you to calculate the Probability of Dangerous Failure per Hour (PFHd) of your entire safety circuit. Statistics are involved … but don’t let that scare you. A free software called SISTEMA can do the math for you. Most safety hardware manufacturers also provide libraries you can import into SISTEMA.

These calculations help determine how many times you can exercise a safety circuit before it fails in a dangerous state. The keyword here is “dangerous,” which means “an undetectable fault.” For example, A machine that doesn’t stop when you put your hand past a light curtain or press the emergency stop button. Remember: PFHd makes up only one-third of a safety circuit’s total characteristics; design structure (Category) and monitoring (DC) are also important.

  • If your safety circuit’s chance of failure to a dangerous state (PFHd) is between one in one million and one in 10 million, that’s 1×10-6 to 1×10-7, which equates to PLd or SIL2 (see table above).

If your safety circuit’s chance of failure to a dangerous state is less than one in 10 million, then that equates to PLe or SIL3 (see table above).

I prefer to use ISO 13849, and if I need to convert that to a SIL, a few charts in IEC 62061 make it easy to do so.

What’s the difference between PL and SIL machine safety standards?
, , ,

 By 

Machine safety is governed by two standards: EN/ISO 13849-1 and EN/IEC 62061. Both standards are harmonized to the EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, which defines the Essential Health and Safety Requirements (EHSR) for machinery. Although their methods for performing risk assessment are different, both standards — EN ISO 13849-1 and EN 62061 (SIL) — when correctly applied, achieve the same result.


The EU Machinery Directive requires that machine manufacturers eliminate or minimize hazards as much as reasonably possible, apply necessary protective measures against hazards that cannot be eliminated, and inform users of the risks that remain and requirements for training or personal protective equipment. Although this directive is specific to the European Union (EU), it is recognized and followed in other regions around the world to better facilitate equipment shipments outside the EU.


The EN/ISO 13849-1 machine safety standard uses a qualitative risk graph, or flow chart, to assign a performance level (PL), based on three criteria:

  • severity of injury
  • frequency and/or exposure time to the hazard
  • possibility of avoiding the hazard or limiting the harm

The performance level (PL) is designated by an alphabetic character, a through e, with PLe being the highest risk level.

machine safety standards
EN/ISO 13849-1 assigns a performance level (PL) rating from a to e, with PLe being the highest risk.
Image credit: TUV

Once the performance level has been determined, the architecture that facilitates the defined performance level is classified into one of six categories (“B” and 1 through 5, with B being the least safe and 5 being the most safe). The architecture category is determined by combining the performance level (PL) with quantitative measures of diagnostic coverage (DC) and mean time to dangerous failure (MTTFd).

functional safety
This chart shows the relationship between Category, Diagnostic Coverage, and Mean Time to Dangerous Failure for PL levels under EN/ISO 13849-1. Note also the correlation with probability of dangerous failure per hour (PFHd) rates.
Image credit: ABB

The EN/IEC 62061 machine safety standard (often written as just EN 62061) assigns a safety integrity level (SIL) to each function based on the severity of the potential harm (Se) and the probability of the harm occurring.

The severity of potential harm is given a score from 1 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. The probability of harm occurring is broken down into three parameters:

  • frequency and duration of exposure (Fr)
  • probability of an event occurring (Pr)
  • probability of avoiding or limiting the harm (Av)
machine safety standards
EN 62061 assigns a safety integrity level (SIL) from 1 to 3 based on the severity of potential harm and the probability of the harm occurring.
Image credit: TÜV

Each of these parameters is scored from 1 to 5, with 5 being the “worst,” or least safe situation, and their scores are summed to determine a class (Cl). The SIL rating is then chosen from a matrix that plots the severity scores (Se) and classes (Cl).

machine safety standards
SIL ratings are determined by a matrix that ranks the severity of injury and the injury classification.

Once the safety integrity level (SIL) has been assigned, the system is broken into subsystems, whose architectures are classified as A, B, C, or D, with D being the “highest,” or safest. Each architecture is associated with a formula to determine the probability of dangerous failure per hour (PFHd) of the subsystem.

machine safety standards

Note that performance level (PL) ratings under EN/ISO 13849-1 are also correlated with probability of dangerous failures per hour (PFHd) values, so direct comparisons can be made between EN/ISO 13849-1 performance levels and EN 62061 safety integrity levels.


There is no strict guideline regarding the use of machine safety standards for particular applications, but the choice may be influenced by:

  • Prior experience with one standard or risk assessment methodology
  • The use of safety-related controls that are not based on electrical, electronic, or programmable electronic systems (use EN/ISO 13849-1)
  • A requirement to use SIL ratings to demonstrate safety integrity (use IEC 62061)
  • Use of equipment in process industries where other safety-related systems are characterized in terms of SIL (use IEC 62061)

Bellypack RANGER Systems

Product page: RANGER Remote Control Systems for Hydraulics 

Our belly pack RANGER systems are a simple, cost-effective way to retrofit a wireless remote on a manual hydraulic system with 4 to 6 axes of variable speed control.

The package is supplied with electrical actuators to stroke the valves in both directions, and all hardware to connect the actuators to the valve handles or linkages. The actuators are connected to the receiver with a premade harness.

The belly pack RANGER is fast and smooth; it responds in 0.05 seconds and feathers all of the crane functions. Installation is simple with our illustrated manual.


See Also: Handheld | Ranger 3 | Ranger 4 | Ranger 6 | Servo Linear Actuator


 

Four or six proportional paddles control the winch and boom, and additional toggle switches drive the auxiliary functions and boom speed selection. There is a key switch mounted on the side for turning the transmitter on and off, as well as starting the engine. Side-mounted, sealed pushbuttons are used for increasing and decreasing the engine RPM, as well as for the horn. Enable buttons are on the transmitter and are required to be pressed in order to operate the crane, as a safety feature along with the Emergency Stop switch. The belly pack transmitter can run over an included tether cable in the event of a dead battery, and all functions can be manually controlled on the receiver/control box, or even using the manual levers.

Our radios are proven safe and secure. The CAN actuators that control the valves are fast and precise to 0.01” with 90 pounds of force. They are environmentally hardened for all weather. An internal clutch allows the local operation of the valve handles without any effort when not in active wireless operation. This control is tough – all electronics are silicone-dip-coated or encapsulated, every switch, joystick, and enclosure is sealed, and the transmitter is molded out of a high-impact rated plastic ready to take a beating on a job site. If you need additional functionality, custom configurations are available by request.


Each Bellypack RANGER System includes the following components:


PACKER Series Radio Transmitter

The PACKER transmitter is molded out of a high-impact plastic that’s durable from -40 to +185F (as are all components, including the electronics!). It contains switches for winch speed and boom speed, and two for basket leveling (or use them for an auxiliary function).

It has either four or six fully proportional paddles for smooth control of your winch, boom elevation, boom rotation, and boom extension. The six-paddle version adds paddles for upper and lower boom elevation and extension, normally for knuckle-boom cranes. There are the enable horn, RPM pushbuttons, an E-Stop switch, and a three-position key switch for power and engine start – just like your car.

It runs off of internal rechargeable batteries that provide approximately 20 hours of operating life between charges. A high-quality padded shoulder strap is included.


Radio Receiver

This radio receiver module directly drives the actuators, crane switches, and all engine functions with two simple plug-and-play front-panel-mounted sealed connectors. It provides all outputs based on transmitter commands. The ARM-powered receiver is housed in a sealed polycarbonate enclosure with industry-standard sealed Deutsch connectors. All I/O are protected against reverse battery connections, transient voltage spikes, short circuits, and overloads.

The system has an onboard backlit 2×16 character display for easy setup and configuration, manual backup, diagnostics, calibration, and histogram, driven by four sealed pushbutton switches. In addition to driving the actuators, it has multiple outputs for various throttle control types, and outputs for engine start, engine stop, horn, and basket tilt (or auxiliary). RS-232 is on board for configuration as well.


12/24V Linear Actuators

These CAN-enabled actuators provide 90 pounds of force with a 3” maximum stroke and a built-in processor for precise control of hydraulic valves. They have an internal clutch to enable freewheeling back to the center position when the joystick is released, or power is lost as a safety feature, and are fully weather-sealed.


Bellypack RANGER Mounting Hardware Kit

Mounting Hardware Kit

This kit comprises adjustable linkage rods and clevises for connecting the actuators to the valve handles. The steel bracket is supplied by the installer.


Pre-Made Wiring Harness

This pre-made harness is designed to snap into each system component for an effortless installation with two sealed toggle switches for left and right pedestal remote power. All wires and connectors are labeled for easy identification. All sealed connectors are used, and cables are loomed together where required for a clean, plug-and-play installation. Crane connections, such as RPM, horn, etc., are terminated in flying leads.

 


Check out how easily we retrofit this TEREX BT-3870-S Crane with our CAN RANGER 4: Bellypack Ranger System


Want more information…?

Email us at [email protected]  for full installation and operation manuals.

Food Processing

As anyone who has ever baked a cake knows, even a small variation in time or temperature can have drastic results for the finished product.

The food processing and industrial baking industries operate on the same principle, but on a much larger scale. And because the quantity of ingredients involved could potentially result in a huge loss of resources in the event of a mechanical error in timing, the equipment the industrial bakers rely on must be absolutely accurate beyond all doubt.
That’s why industrial bakers and food manufacturers turn to Eagle Signal for their large oven applications, such as the production of bread, pastries, and other products.

Our counters enable machine operators to reliably measure ingredients and accurately monitor oven processes and baking times, thereby preventing material waste, scrap, and the associated time and labor costs involved in reproduction. Eagle Signal offers a range of reset and
repeat cycle timers that are designed to provide user-friendly and accurate time and process control of oven baking time.
Eagle Signal BRE Reset Timer – Anderson Controls Incorporated

BRE timers feature enclosed construction with front-facing dial and knob and a heavy-duty terminal block, with 9 screw terminals that will readily accept 16 gauge wire commonly used in industrial circuit wiring. The case of the BRE series timer is injection molded Lexan®. This material is recognized by Underwriters Laboratories for use as the sole support of current-carrying components. Lexan is self-extinguishing, has a high impact strength, and high dimensional stability.BRE timers are available in 11 different time ranges and 120 to 240VAC, 50/60Hz.

The NEW BRE series reset timers are microprocessor-driven. They provide an accurate, adjustable time delay between the actuation of the control circuit and the operation of the load switches.

The new standard pilot light is on during the timing period.